Wasn't there a discussion about this some weeks ago - I think that the underexposure related to the ISO settings? Can't remember exactly but would be very grateful if someone would enlighten me so that I don't have to face the same problems when mine arrives!
TIA, tan. > Oh, man. Am I glad you wrote that. I have been having the same problem and it > has been driving me insane. It's haunted me for the past two months. I've > searched all over the flash and camera for some setting that I have wrong. The > whole issue is exasperated by the fact that when not using the flash I normall > have the camera in Spot metering mode. When I don the AF360FGZ I forget to > switch and invariably the "spot" is right on somebody's white shirt so I can > always have that to "blame" it on. > > I've been meaning to do some testing with setting up a test subject and taking > the same picture with same settings and conditions with both the FGZ and the > built-in flash. > > I've searched the archives for others mentioning this with no luck even though I > think I recall a thread that took place before I owned a *istD. > > I've seriously been considering sending the body and flash in for repair. > > How many people are experiencing this problem and what are you doing about it? > I've tried some to use camera exposure compensations between +0.5EV and 1.5EV > depending on the situation with mixed success. > > ------------ > > > > Now, if I could only get the *ist D to not underexpose > > with the AF360FGZ. -- Bill > > > > >
