On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:29:42 +1000, you wrote: > >As far as lenses go, like I said, it would totally suck to have to buy all >new glass and flash guns, but OTOH, in the long run, I need to give my >clients the best quality shots that I can afford, and the Canon and Nikkor >lenses aren't exactly lacking in the quality stakes... Or are they? >
Last I heard, and that was a year ago reading lots of DPreview.com forum messages, the Fuji S2 supposed to be the wedding photographer's DSLR of choice, because of good skin tones and sharpening right out of the camera. Eliminating post-processing was thought to be critical to even bothering to use a DSLR at weddings. With film, the negs would be fixed by the lab; with the D100 or D60 (at the time the competition) the post-processing time would be much greater than the S2. But weddings are not my bag. I got tricked into doing one once, before I knew anything about photography except how to push the shutter button, and I've never recovered from it. -- John Mustarde www.photolin.com
