Well, there is a fact that things are not like they were back in the 60's when highend camera makers made only highend lenses. Now, like automobiles, a manufacturer makes cheap cameras, mid-line cameras, and high-end cameras. They also make lenses in each of those quality ranges. A cheap lens is a cheap lens, it does not matter who makes it.

At one time Pentax had several rebadged lenses. I a assured by a Pentax Rep that that is no longer true. I translate that to "Pentax now makes their own junk lenses". The same applies to other brands. I have a friend who uses old cheap Nikons, he does not see any difference in his 606's and an F-5 except price. He recently bought a new nikon lens. The sales guy sold him one of the new aperture ringless lenses. He called me distraught about how his new lens would not work on his old cameras. I told him to simply take it back.

The thing about cheap lenses, is in these computer design, cam manufactured days, they are often quite good optically. What they lack is build quality, and features (like aperature rings).

--

Shel Belinkoff wrote:

Hi Tan,

It's also been my understanding that several (maybe quite a
few) Pentax lenses are just rebadged Tamron or Tokina
glass.  I have also heard that Minolta (I knew this) and
SIGMA! have produced lenses for Leica.  I don't know the
degree of Sigmas involvement, whether they just produced the
lenses or produced them to very specific Leica standards or
design.  IAC, these days it's sometimes hard to know just
what you're buying, and maybe it's no longer important ...
maybe it never was.  After all, when it comes to lenses,
it's the finished product, the photograph, that really
matters.

However, Tanya, I do believe that, overall, build quality
and optical quality have taken a dive when it comes to many
of the lenses out there.  Only when you are paying for the
high end glass are you reasonably sure you're getting good
quality on both fronts.

Another thing to consider is that when people tell you a
lens is great, or poor, or sharp, be cautious.  Descriptive
terms are very subjective.  Whenever possible try the lenses
yourself to be sure they meet YOUR standards. Not only are
subjective descriptions suspect to some degree, there are
also sometimes wide variations in sample quality.  So, while
everyone swears the XYZ 15 - 500mm zoom is a jewel, you may
be the lucky one to get a clunker.

With digital cameras you have an option that's pretty easy
compared to film users.  You can walk into a shop, ask to
see any number of XYZ 15 -500mm zooms, and try 'em all out
on the spot, stick your card into your portable computer,
and look at the results immediately, giving you a chance to
choose the best one.

Anyway, that's my kvetch for today.

Kind regards from fog bound California ... shel

Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:


"Plus, you comment about the lenses, yet so many Pentax users attach Sigma,
Tokina, and Tamron lenses to their cameras ...
and often rave about them.  Clearly people aren't all buying Pentax for the
lenses."

I agree with this also, and wonder if anyone knows just how third party
lenses hold up these days by way of quality and optics - I am particularly
interested in Tamron in this respect...




-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com

"You might as well accept people as they are,
you are not going to be able to change them anyway."




Reply via email to