I like the comment in http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=96625&cid=8269169 - no idea if it's true or not though. :-)

"Most Financial Managers love the Gartner group for some reason, but WRT technology, I've never found them to be right. I think someone pointed out, using their TCO formula, your toaster costs you $4000 a year to own."

S

Peter Alling wrote:

I don't believe in analysts.  The Gartner group gave a former employer
of mine a glowing report for it's use of Object Oriented technology.
It was a hoot, to those of us who were on the inside.

At 06:24 AM 2/19/04, you wrote:

whatever photographers believe, financial analysts are interested in
companies like that as investments to make money. they see Pentax as being
viable only as a DSLR and digital medium format vendor. they feel that it
will be irrelevant in the digital P&S market and the film market as being
irrelevant in general not too long from now for Japanese investors.


Herb....
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: is the MZ-S the "FAltd" camera?


> In the later mounths, I found Pentax quite change, with new reactivity :
> the firmware 1.1 is a good clue.
>
> But, may be Pentax will become an open source just like Linux ? The
> engineers will be the users ???
>
> I hope I won the lottery to help PENTAX R&D.


I drink to make other people interesting.
-- George Jean Nathan



Reply via email to