was intimately connected with. All I can say is I'd love to be in their accounting
department. I could replace their entire team of researchers and analysts with a monkey
a typewriter and a dart board and still get better results.
At 11:39 AM 2/19/04, you wrote:
I like the comment in http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=96625&cid=8269169 - no idea if it's true or not though. :-)
"Most Financial Managers love the Gartner group for some reason, but WRT technology, I've never found them to be right. I think someone pointed out, using their TCO formula, your toaster costs you $4000 a year to own."
S
Peter Alling wrote:
I don't believe in analysts. The Gartner group gave a former employer of mine a glowing report for it's use of Object Oriented technology. It was a hoot, to those of us who were on the inside. At 06:24 AM 2/19/04, you wrote:
whatever photographers believe, financial analysts are interested in companies like that as investments to make money. they see Pentax as being viable only as a DSLR and digital medium format vendor. they feel that it will be irrelevant in the digital P&S market and the film market as being irrelevant in general not too long from now for Japanese investors.
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:29 PM Subject: Re: is the MZ-S the "FAltd" camera?
> In the later mounths, I found Pentax quite change, with new reactivity : > the firmware 1.1 is a good clue. > > But, may be Pentax will become an open source just like Linux ? The > engineers will be the users ??? > > I hope I won the lottery to help PENTAX R&D.
I drink to make other people interesting. -- George Jean Nathan
I drink to make other people interesting.
-- George Jean Nathan
