S
Herb Chong wrote:
then i don't get the point of the reference to or the use of PSP 7 and grain in your original msg. PSP 7 is a lot worse than Photoshop at color management and that means it's not very useful for photographic work. it only color manages to the monitor and not to the printer.
Herb...
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Miers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: Grain Surgery for PS
I'm not using Photoshop or grainsurgery for scanning itself. But
actually
the scanning program does make a difference IMHO. VueScan gets much
better
shadow detail then the Minolta software that comes with the scanner no matter how manually I've tried it. VueScan also focuses the scanner much faster then the Minolta software and I've yet to notice any loss of sharp focus there. To a point the scanning program can make a difference as
well
because of some compensation built into the manufacturers software for the hardware created noise. I think I do get a bit more noise out of VueScan, but usually better overall results in the end. But as for this post it
only
refers to after scanning processing, not scanning itself.

