Silly me. It's all that experimenting with whisky. I just thought he'd aged a bit between exposures.

John

On 23 Feb 2004 15:12:29 +0100, Frits W�thrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

There were two sitters actually. But I agree with you.

On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:27, John Forbes wrote:
16 works best for me.  It looks totally uncontrived and natural.  I'd
hazard a guess it's the sitter's favourite.

John

On 23 Feb 2004 12:46:26 +0100, Frits W�thrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret007.jpg
> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret016.jpg
> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret019.jpg
> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret036.jpg
> Obviously comments welcome. These are 4 that I made last Saturday during
> a portrait workshop.
> Camera PZ-1, lens 24-90mm, film Fuji NPH400, and the portraits in the
> studio were done with a single light, incandescent lamp, with blue
> filter to match daylight colour of the film, and the light shining
> through an umbrella, and a piece of white Styrofoam to lighten the
> shadows.



-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/



Reply via email to