Thanks Rob,
How long has the clone tool been around? I typically find myself doing the
bare minimum to get acceptable results... maybe because I don't start till
around 10PM usually. I have Photoshop 4.0 installed and 6.0 sitting there
in the box.
Tom C.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: bad processing
> On 5 Apr 2001, at 17:03, aimcompute wrote:
>
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > I am interested in the new Nikon Scanners when they are released. I
would
> > guess that your comment above is based on the fact that no software can
> > match a human operator's intuition on where to apply changes to the
> > digitized image. Is this correct, or does Digital ICE produce some kind
of
> > uniform degradation when used? Thanks.
> >
> > P.S. Digital ICE is not really a deciding factor for me, but it sounds
> > good.
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Both, the Digital ICE does slightly soften the entire image and I would
guess
> that this effect would be more pronounced when applied to the new
> generation of Nikon scanners (as they are reported to be able to resolve
far
> more at their quoted 4000dpi than other current 4000dpi scanners) and yes
> the ICE can only replace lost data with an interpolated value. If you have
had
> experience using the clone tool in Photoshop or other image editing
> packages you will know that it is very flexible and can often be used to
> reconstruct even large areas of damaged emulsion.
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
