Bill, There are so many jurisdictions, and so many variations on "the law" that it would be impossible to quote anything. Most of what I've read about and seen deals with subjective interpretation of what constitutes pornography. My comment to Tanya was made because recently a couple was prosecuted in (maybe) Florida because the photo lab they brought their film to turned them in to authorities because the lab people thought the pics were porn. The photos were of the couple's child taking a bath. I honestly don't recall the outcome, although I do believe the child was taken from the parents pending the outcome of an investigation. There are more details, of course.
shel William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shel Belinkoff" > Subject: Re: a little something i've been working on... > > > > > Here in the US what you've done could be considered child > > pornography in some places. > > Shel, explain this please. I thought Canada had some pretty > ridiculous kiddie porn laws. > If this series crosses the line in an American jurisdiction, I would > be totally amazed by the stupidity of the law, and of the judge/jury > on the case, not to mention the persecutor who is trying it. > > If you could quote the law in question that would be great. > > William Robb
