Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Tan ...
On my monitor the background looks a little different in each shot. Some frames have more detail, others less. If that' how the bg actually appears, imo, it distracts from the montage.
Here in the US what you've done could be considered child pornography in some places.
I hardly think so, Shel.
What would they call it, full upper nudity? Chest high Monty shots?
She barely shows his belly button! And in one shot, you can see the [gasp!] upper part of his trousers!
keith
IAC, I like the concept, but the execution leaves me feeling rather ho-hum about the whole thing. Not sure exactly why - J's a cute kid and looks to be enjoying himself. Maybe it loses something on the screen ... hmmm .... perhaps the conversion to B&W leaves something to be desired. IAC, it's not 100% for me.
shel
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
A figure study, fairygirl style...
http://www.tanyamayer.com/jaimynmontageweb.jpg
Comments and criticisms greatly appreciated...
tan.
