It is sad that the straw-man arguments about child porn so often defer to these clearly innocent, not at all purient, pictures of children. But so often these argumetns are used as a continuing perjorative against any morality imposed on an "art" expression.
Let us not take the side of defending real child porn because some individual may over-react to pictures like these.* To defend against the real problem of child porn is not the work of "small-minded conservatives" but supported by most people of all bents. Porn is not a victimless crime. Collin *You might continue to do so if you really think child porn should be allowed. But then you will, by definition, lose any moral standing to defend your position. Declaring morality to be immoral would beg the question, wouldn't it? You Kant have it both ways.
