Whether this would be considered child porn (even in this little corner of hard-core right-wing America) would depend a great deal on who possesses it. A parent in possession of photos such as these or who has them on a family website - most wouldn't bat an eye. However, if these photos were found on someone's computer with other photos of children which are definitely pornographic, this would probably be a separate count. Otherwise, no law enforcement officer in his right mind would consider these child pornography. How do I know? My husband investigates crimes against juveniles for a living. When you know what actually is out there, these are nothing.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:49 AM Subject: Re: a little something i've been working on... > Well, IMO, based on news reports I've read, you're wrong. > > "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote: > > > > I don't think that Tanja's photos would be considered child porn > > anywhere in the US. They are quite innocent and very well done, IMO. > >
