Shel said: > Paul, > > You've created something that does not exist. IMO, that's not a portrait > but a work of art, a creation. The work is good, the woman looks good, > but, imo, agreeing with Peter, some of her character is gone. I think, as a > portrait, you overdid the Photoshop work. If this were to be for a > magazine ad, I'd proffer high praise. The people in magazine ads are often > portrayed as "perfect examples of humankind," with flaws, wrinkles, and > anomalies removed so as to create a fantasy for the viewer. But this is a > portrait, and it should show more of the real person, Imo. > > I think we'll just have to disagree on the merits of the final result with > me giving strong praise for your Photoshop skills.
So why don't we just agree to call it a "Glamour Shot"? ERN
