On 8 Jun 2004 at 15:33, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote: > Well, it seems that least distorted are samples from 10D and D1X, with *istD > next. But what would happen if you cramp up sharpness and contrast of *istD > image to the levels similar to let's say 10D???
The D1X is pretty good but it still suffers from some pretty hideous aliasing errors mostly due to over sharpening I assume. I think that most of the cameras but the *ist D are being pushed past their usable limits in order to achieve "good" results in largely irrelevant tests. All I can say is that when used well the *ist D can produce printed photographic results that don't have that identifiable digital look. All that I can put this down to is that the designers wanted the images it produced to look like photos and as such didn't try to extract information from the sensor that was beyond its capabilities and I'm pretty glad about that. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
