Antonio Aparicio wrote:
The Takumar 135/2.5 bayonet is a dog - best avoided,
A.
By whose word? Are you testifying directly and personally that it's not a worthy lens? How do you know? Have you personally tested one? Or are you parroting someone else's opinion?
keith whaley
On 11 Jun 2004, at 23:37, Jon M wrote:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/_non-SMC/tak_135f2.5.html
A local shop has one in his inventory, and is asking $50 for it. There are no reviews of it on Stan's page. I was wondering if any of y'all have any experience with this lens, or any insight as to whether it'd be a decent addition to my small but growing collection of K-mount goodies?
Thanks. -Jon Myers.