What a load of rubish. You are just being contrary because I said it
was a dog. If anyone else where to have said it wasnt a good lens - as
many have over the years you would no doubt have agreed and said, yes
its only worth $20 or $30 ... given that the questioner is being asked
$40 for the lens the only honest reply you should have given was, no
its not worth it mate.
On 12 Jun 2004, at 05:35, Christian Skofteland wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio Aparicio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, you loved it so much you would not recomend spending more than
$20
on it. Contradiction?
Nope. It was worth every penny I spent on it. Best bang for the buck.
HIGHLY recommended as a ~$30 lens.
And I believe I said not to pay more than $30 (re-reading posts...)
yep,
that's what I said.
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
