Aha, the opinion police are back!
I've owned it, it was a dog, I got rid of it. My opinion.
Antonio
On 11 Jun 2004, at 23:58, Keith Whaley wrote:
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
The Takumar 135/2.5 bayonet is a dog - best avoided,
A.
By whose word?
Are you testifying directly and personally that it's not a worthy lens?
How do you know? Have you personally tested one?
Or are you parroting someone else's opinion?
keith whaley
On 11 Jun 2004, at 23:37, Jon M wrote:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/_non-SMC/tak_135f2.5.html
A local shop has one in his inventory, and is asking
$50 for it. There are no reviews of it on Stan's page.
I was wondering if any of y'all have any experience
with this lens, or any insight as to whether it'd be a
decent addition to my small but growing collection of
K-mount goodies?
Thanks.
-Jon Myers.
