I have a Tamron 90mm SP AF lens that is widely regarded as having some of
the best bokeh ever, some have said better than comparable Leica primes.  On
close comparisons I found that my Pentax SMC-F 50 1.7 has equal bokeh, seems
to be slightly finer even.  We can talk all day, but I've seen the goods.
Sure my old Takumar 200 lens occasionally rendered out of focus highlights
with hard edges, but in general that didn't happen.  That lens is also 40
years old and a telephoto.  I've seen plenty of crappy Bokehs from Canon and
Sigma, which is more along the lines of whom Pentax competes with.  If you
haven't actually used Pentax's finest, then there is no sense in comparing
Pentax to a fine quality manufacturer like Zeiss.

-That Guy



Alan Chan wrote:

"That raises another question. Are the bokeh and contrast of Pentax lenses
really that good as some might suggested in general? I personally feel the
bokeh of most Pentax lenses that I have used are okay, but not that great
except maybe a few. Many have the bright-ring bokeh chatacteristics. Contax
Zeiss lenses, in general, have better colour, contrast and bokeh imho. But
then this is not a Contax list.  :-)"

Reply via email to