Canon & Sigma have more crappy bokeh do not make Pentax good, but relatively better only. But thanks for lecture. I feel sorry for myself that I can only afford so few and so low end non-finest Pentax lenses like FA*24/2, FA31/1.8, FA43/1.9, FA77/1.8, FA*85/1.4, FA100/2.8, FA*200/2.8, F*300/4.5. I should be ashame of myself.

Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan

I have a Tamron 90mm SP AF lens that is widely regarded as having some of
the best bokeh ever, some have said better than comparable Leica primes. On
close comparisons I found that my Pentax SMC-F 50 1.7 has equal bokeh, seems
to be slightly finer even. We can talk all day, but I've seen the goods.
Sure my old Takumar 200 lens occasionally rendered out of focus highlights
with hard edges, but in general that didn't happen. That lens is also 40
years old and a telephoto. I've seen plenty of crappy Bokehs from Canon and
Sigma, which is more along the lines of whom Pentax competes with. If you
haven't actually used Pentax's finest, then there is no sense in comparing
Pentax to a fine quality manufacturer like Zeiss.

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the MSN Premium and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines




Reply via email to