----- Original Message ----- From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> And who is right??? ;-) :-) >From a technical pov, it's always hard to argue with the real experts. I remember that statement from last autumn, and I'm not going to dispute anything... Still, I find the *istD raw files lacking in sharpness, and I believe I know how to use both the USM in photoshop, and the various sharpening tools elsewhere. For example, the I think PhaseOne C1 Pro gives me slightly sharper tiffs than the raw converter in photoshop. An both are of course better than the native Pentax thingy. At the same time, I see users of other brands produce images with a sharpness I am not able to get. Which frustrates me. :-( cheers, Jostein
