Not true. The difference has absolutely nothing to do with digital or film.
I se no reason at all why the recording media should have any impact on DOF.
It's simply because of the format. That's all. So, you could just say: DOF
is greater for APS cameras (or just smaller formats). Everybody and his
mother knows that!

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. juli 2004 23:55
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: OT: DOF and digital cameras


Huh?
I am pretty sure I have a handle on depth of field.

William Robb

----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio Aparicio"
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] OT: DOF and digital cameras


> Primarily for William Robb, but usefull for anyone else grapling
with
> this issue.
>
> "I expected the depth of field in digital cameras to be
significantly
> greater than that in 35 mm models. Everybody and his mother knows
that.
> What I didn't expect, is how large the difference is."
>
> Full article at:
>
> http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/dof/
>
>




Reply via email to