actually it has nothing to do with digital or film OR FORMAT. DOF is determined solely by the reproduction ratio of the image size to the subject size and aperture used. All else is irrelevant. JCO
-----Original Message----- From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DOF and digital cameras Not true. The difference has absolutely nothing to do with digital or film. I se no reason at all why the recording media should have any impact on DOF. It's simply because of the format. That's all. So, you could just say: DOF is greater for APS cameras (or just smaller formats). Everybody and his mother knows that! Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 19. juli 2004 23:55 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: OT: DOF and digital cameras Huh? I am pretty sure I have a handle on depth of field. William Robb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Antonio Aparicio" Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] OT: DOF and digital cameras > Primarily for William Robb, but usefull for anyone else grapling with > this issue. > > "I expected the depth of field in digital cameras to be significantly > greater than that in 35 mm models. Everybody and his mother knows that. > What I didn't expect, is how large the difference is." > > Full article at: > > http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/dof/ > >
