Finally someone got it. That is precisely what I was refering to in my
earlier posts, 35mm SLR vs APS digital (*istD). I eagerly await
afordable full frame digital.
A.
On 20 Jul 2004, at 00:19, Jens Bladt wrote:
Not true. The difference has absolutely nothing to do with digital or
film.
I se no reason at all why the recording media should have any impact
on DOF.
It's simply because of the format. That's all. So, you could just say:
DOF
is greater for APS cameras (or just smaller formats). Everybody and his
mother knows that!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. juli 2004 23:55
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: OT: DOF and digital cameras
Huh?
I am pretty sure I have a handle on depth of field.
William Robb
----- Original Message -----
From: "Antonio Aparicio"
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] OT: DOF and digital cameras
Primarily for William Robb, but usefull for anyone else grapling
with
this issue.
"I expected the depth of field in digital cameras to be
significantly
greater than that in 35 mm models. Everybody and his mother knows
that.
What I didn't expect, is how large the difference is."
Full article at:
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/dof/
