Really? It's a function of the focal length of the lens (for a given aperture).
Smaller format = shorter focal length "normal" lens = greater depth of field. Digital cameras (and APS cameras) are smaller format than 35mm. Regards, Bob... From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Not true. The difference has absolutely nothing to do with digital or film. > I se no reason at all why the recording media should have any impact on DOF. > It's simply because of the format. That's all. So, you could just say: DOF > is greater for APS cameras (or just smaller formats). Everybody and his > mother knows that! > > Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Huh? > I am pretty sure I have a handle on depth of field. > > From: "Antonio Aparicio" > > > Primarily for William Robb, but usefull for anyone else grapling > with > > this issue. > > > > "I expected the depth of field in digital cameras to be > significantly > > greater than that in 35 mm models. Everybody and his mother knows > that. > > What I didn't expect, is how large the difference is." > > > > Full article at: > > > > http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/dof/
