Thanks Bill. I had already cropped the original to my desired composition, but a great suggestion.
Anyhould, I've chosen a different submission. :-(


Just an idea for the PUG... there are a number of other sites with a more generous max file size. Any chance that several years down the road (from before), with many having a higher bandwidth, and with storage being less expensive, that we could relax the PUG max file size somewhat?

Thanks.

Tom C.





From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: JPEG Compression Limits
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:40:59 -0600


----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C" Subject: JPEG Compression Limits


> I've been trying to get my PUG entry finished and when getting to the last > step of saving it as a .jpg, the smallest I can compress the file is 102K, > at Photoshop quality level of zero. This is for an image that is 600 * 394 > pixels, resampled at 72 ppi. There is noticieable degradation in the image. > > The smallest I can compress the image at it's physical pixel size, and still > get reasonably good results yields a filesize of 134K at Photoshop quality > level 3. > > Any suggestions or have I simply hit the compression wall? The image is a > silohuetted trees with fairly open branches and therefore, I assume, has > quite a bit of image info compared to shots that may have large contiguous > blocks of color (assuming again I have an inkling of how jpeg compression > works).

Try making the file physically smaller.
Knock 50 pixels off the longest side while maintaining the same
aspect ratio and see how it does.
If that doesn't do it, go back in history to the original size, and
knock 75 pixels off the long side.

It was how I dealt with oversize files when I ran the show.

William Robb






Reply via email to