Adelheid also suggested Irfanview may produce a smaller file (which it does... without hiding things in so many menus and dropdowns).
I've used Irfanview just a little bit over the last several weeks, and for a free product, it's pretty nice.
Tom C.
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: JPEG Compression Limits Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:56:25 +0200
Are you using "save for Web" or just "save as...". My experience is that "save for web" makes smaller files. From what I've heard the reason is that the "Save as..." stores some additional information in the file, while "Save for Web" strips it for everything but the image data.
DagT
> Fra: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks Bill. I had already cropped the original to my desired composition,
> but a great suggestion.
> Anyhould, I've chosen a different submission. :-(
>
> Just an idea for the PUG... there are a number of other sites with a more
> generous max file size. Any chance that several years down the road (from
> before), with many having a higher bandwidth, and with storage being less
> expensive, that we could relax the PUG max file size somewhat?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tom C.
