I actually tried both and only saw about 2k difference, which wasn't enough
to help me. Thanks.
Tom C.
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: JPEG Compression Limits
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:56:25 +0200
Are you using "save for Web" or just "save as...". My experience is that
"save for web" makes smaller files. From what I've heard the reason is
that the "Save as..." stores some additional information in the file, while
"Save for Web" strips it for everything but the image data.
DagT
> Fra: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks Bill. I had already cropped the original to my desired
composition,
> but a great suggestion.
> Anyhould, I've chosen a different submission. :-(
>
> Just an idea for the PUG... there are a number of other sites with a
more
> generous max file size. Any chance that several years down the road
(from
> before), with many having a higher bandwidth, and with storage being
less
> expensive, that we could relax the PUG max file size somewhat?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tom C.
