> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 7:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tan's foray into stock photography....
>
>
>
> Thanks Don! That is my grubby little hand you see there, and eek, I just
> realised that I am still wearing my wedding ring....
>
<snip>
>
> Anyways, I don't know why, but I love that one too - i was thinking that
> maybe it could be used in some women's magazine illustrating one
> of those 5
> minute fiction stories, maybe about someone trying to escape or
> something...
>
<snip>

In that context I think the wedding ring 'might' make a statement.

Don


>
> tan.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 10:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Tan's foray into stock photography....
>
>
> The shot with the fence and hand is a very powerful image.
> I think B&W was perfect for it.
> Brought all kinds of thoughts to mind.
> It's my favorite because it keeps making me go back and look again.
> Some very nice work tan.
>
> Don
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:53 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Tan's foray into stock photography....
> >
> >
> > ooops, I just realised that I lied in my previous post! I did a
> litle more
> > manipulation to some of the shots than I said - ie. cloned out the dust
> > spots from my grubby sensor, and also vignetted a couple of
> them.  Oh, and
> > also, the shots of the fence have been manipulated further again
> > - I had to
> > clone out the bird poo that was all over it! hehe.
> >
> > Oh, and yes, before anyone asks, I most certainly *do* have a pink and
> > purple fence - I mean what other colour fence do you think *I*
> > would have?!?
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > tan.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 9:17 AM
> > To: Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Tan's foray into stock photography....
> >
> >
> >
> > or whatever you may wish to call it....
> >
> > Anyways, at the risk of being in lots of trouble from the COF's for my
> > prattling this morning, I thought I'd better show that I
> actually do take
> > the odd photo now and again too...  and, whoa, i even used pentax
> > equipment!
> > woohoo!
> >
> > I have been studiously watching the stock photography sites for sometime
> > now, and noticed that most images are posted in groups pertaining to a
> > certain theme and/or variations on it.  I wanted to do some
> funky looking
> > stuff, so that they aren't just "boring, old, flower pics", hence
> > the colour
> > shifts etc.
> >
> > So, here's the link to the gallery:
> >
> > http://www.tanyamayer.com/stock22july04/
> >
> > And this one is my undisputed favourite from the day, and has no
> > manipulation at all, this is straight from the camera:
> >
> > http://www.tanyamayer.com/stock22july04/22.htm
> >
> > So, when I was shooting my beloved lavender yesterday, I thought
> > I'd have a
> > play with some different techniques.  Most of these have been
> manipulated
> > using levels/colour balance in the Pentax RAW converter, however
> > all are the
> > original crops/compositions etc.  God only knows what anyone
> > would ever want
> > to buy/use them for, but I guess it can't hurt to try!
> >
> > All shot with *istD, and Tokina 28-70/2.8 atx pro, tamron AF 2x
> > teleconverter, AF-500ftz, and Lumiquest Promax Softbox.  Oh,
> > except for the
> > ones that are obviously wide, which were shot using the FAJ 18-35.  All
> > hand-held, various exposures due to changes in depth of field etc, and
> > varied from 1/30th (for the blurred ones, and those with
> movement in them.
> > btw, if they have movement/blur in them, it *was* intentional, lol!) to
> > around 1/150th, and between f3.5-f11.
> >
> > And while we're on the subject, any ideas which would be the best agency
> > that I should approach?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > tan.
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to