I think I will do one last test the next few days, along with FA*24/2 this time and see how they compared. I have always done tests the same way (tripod, self-timer, magnifier etc, just able the way I shoot) so there is nothing else I could do. Scanning is always done with Minolta Scan Elite so all scans are comparable. What surprises me is the lack of detail (almost none) with all close-up pictures. I think even FA*24/2 does much better than that, but we'll see.

Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan

In my honest opinion, unless you shoot with a similar lens like
a 17mm fish or 20mm under exact same conditions using a tripod
there is no way to tell. Don't rush to send it back if you don't
have to. Compare to some other fine lenses and post BOTH for
us it see and compare. It could be your technique or scanner
or even camera, (try different bodies).
JCO

_________________________________________________________________
Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft� SmartScreen Technology. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN� Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.




Reply via email to