Comments below...

John Francis wrote:



Peter J. Alling wrote:


This shows the hazards of jumping into a thread somewhere in the middle, this discussion was about the letter designations ie A, F, AF, FA, M, (K) on K mount lenses.

The post by John Francis (copied below) named Takumar-A and Takumar-F, as tho' they existed.
It was that question I was addressing.
If John's question was prompted by what you say above, then it was ME that jumped into the middle of a thread and started growing a new branch!

Yes, it was.

Oh. Does that put you off? Sorry.

That wasn't my question, either:  it was a question I was answering,
originally posed by a different poster.  Check the ">" indent level.

If it had any, the previous carats were lost to me.

And Takumar-F lenses, at least, most definitely do exist.

NOT in screw threads. That's all I was talking about.

I have one
sitting here in front of me as I type; it's the 28-80 /f3.5-f4.5 zoom
often sold as a (cheap) kit lens with the SF-1.

The SF-1? That's otherwise known as an SF X, and certainly a K-mount. Came out in '87 or so, as I recall.
What Takumar fits that? The "(Bayonet)" style?
And, it's an automatic focus?
Do you have a reference for it?


keith whaley

I know all about the SMC Takumar screw-mounts; my first SLR was a
Spotmatic II with the 50mm/f1.4, bought mainly on the strength of
the lens.  But I felt that mentioning that variation wouldn't help
someone who was already confused by the K-mount lens terminology.

[...]



Reply via email to