Lets make it a survey, I vote for 3, hell if it were Cotty, I'd vote for 3 twice.

Cotty wrote:

On 11/9/04, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:



I figured, if I'm going to go digital, better do it in style. So I
turned my *istD into a Special Edition Black Tape Leather Strap istD:

http://flickr.com/photo.gne?id=405355
http://flickr.com/photo.gne?id=405353

The finish of the camera mathches the black tape. The strap is a
Spotmatic leather strap, perfect for wrapping around the wrist. The
leather feels way better than the plasticky logo-filled strap provided
with the camera.

Maybe now I'll even use the camera to take some pictures. Do you guys
think using a Leica has affected me too much? :)



When I see a camera that has the name blanked off, there can only be one of the following reason's why:

1)  The camera is being used in a shot on film/tv/advertising and the
name is not needed.

2)  The owner is ashamed of the camera.

3)  The owner is mad as a March hare.

And which one would you be Juan?  ;-)




Cheers, Cotty


___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________







--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to