What is a darkroom? :-) Jens Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 12. september 2004 14:59 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: istD in style Tape seems so much easier than the card trick, however, quite a few photogs have blacked out the print on their lenses with a sharpie. Apart from any practical aspects, they look rather nice, too. BTW, concerning dressing in black. I've found that it's helpful to wear dark colors when working in the darkroom, too. Shel > From: Anthony Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Or.... to photograph subject matter behind glass, although in that case it's > usually only the white print on the lens bezel that needs blacking out, the > camera logo can be hidden by a black card mounted around the lens, extending > beyond the camera body to hide its reflection. > > Lots of black velvet helps, too, as does dressing in total black like a goth > . I've done it myself to photograph store windows and display cases > > regards, > Anthony Farr > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 4:36 AM > Subject: Re: istD in style > > > > On 11/9/04, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > >I figured, if I'm going to go digital, better do it in style. So I > > >turned my *istD into a Special Edition Black Tape Leather Strap istD: > > > > > >http://flickr.com/photo.gne?id=405355 > > >http://flickr.com/photo.gne?id=405353 > > > > > >The finish of the camera mathches the black tape. The strap is a > > >Spotmatic leather strap, perfect for wrapping around the wrist. The > > >leather feels way better than the plasticky logo-filled strap provided > > >with the camera. > > > > > >Maybe now I'll even use the camera to take some pictures. Do you guys > > >think using a Leica has affected me too much? :) > > > > When I see a camera that has the name blanked off, there can only be one > > of the following reason's why: > > > > 1) The camera is being used in a shot on film/tv/advertising and the > > name is not needed. > > > > 2) The owner is ashamed of the camera. > > > > 3) The owner is mad as a March hare. > > > > And which one would you be Juan? ;-)
