If it were Cotty, surely the answer would be 2. ;-)
John
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:15:57 -0400, Peter J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lets make it a survey, I vote for 3, hell if it were Cotty, I'd vote for 3 twice.
Cotty wrote:
On 11/9/04, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
I figured, if I'm going to go digital, better do it in style. So I turned my *istD into a Special Edition Black Tape Leather Strap istD:
http://flickr.com/photo.gne?id=405355 http://flickr.com/photo.gne?id=405353
The finish of the camera mathches the black tape. The strap is a Spotmatic leather strap, perfect for wrapping around the wrist. The leather feels way better than the plasticky logo-filled strap provided with the camera.
Maybe now I'll even use the camera to take some pictures. Do you guys think using a Leica has affected me too much? :)
When I see a camera that has the name blanked off, there can only be one of the following reason's why:
1) The camera is being used in a shot on film/tv/advertising and the name is not needed.
2) The owner is ashamed of the camera.
3) The owner is mad as a March hare.
And which one would you be Juan? ;-)
Cheers, Cotty
___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=====| www.macads.co.uk/snaps _____________________________
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
