I haven't looked at the images we shot closely, I'll report if I find anything strange.
I did like the feel of the lens--I did go back to the FA35 though, because, like it or not, I'm very used to a normal lens... j -- Juan Buhler http://www.jbuhler.com blog at http://www.jbuhler.com/blog On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:50:19 -0700, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, I'll defer to those who have used the lens. I'm not sure Juan > was thrilled with his, but maybe he didn't like other aspects of it apart > from optical quality. I do, however, recall reading some comments that it > was but a so-so lens, but now I'm wondering if those comments weren't > directed towards a different lens - 18~35? > > Shel > > > From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I have to concur on the image quality of the DA 16-45. > >
