>since I have been shooting digital I have put less thought in the photographic process
Very interesting comment. I find I'm doing just the opposite, thinking more and capturing more. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicolas Colarusso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: De-Lurking and Replacement Decision > I totally agree with your comment. Seems to me since I have been shooting > digital I have put less thought in the photographic process. I keep shooting > until I get the image I want. Recently returned to my Mz-S and was forced to > think. What a wonderful feeling. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: October 14, 2004 22:57 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: De-Lurking and Replacement Decision > > That's .... well, I was gonna say something nasty but thought better of > it, so I'll just ask, what makes you say that one can't have control over > their output unless one uses digital. And what the heck is it with so many > of you digi people that you seemingly MUST comment on how many hundreds of > exposures you make? > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If you're not interested in digital optimization of images on the > computer, > > then by all means go out and get the MZ-S, a wonderful film camera. If > > however you're interested in having control over your photographic output, > > then I recommend you seriously consider digital. I recently have started > the > > move into digital, after shooting slides for years, I had no idea as to > the > > time digital would take, but I sure like the results & the long term cost > > savings. During a recent 10 day shoot during which I shot 1400 images, I > > figure I saved, in slide processing costs, the better part of the cost of > > the *ist D. > > > >
