I never received Shel's message as quoted below. Random deletion of messages seems to be one of the few negs of this list. However, I would hope that no one would ever disparage photography that is part of the real day-to-day story of life in the real world. Like everything else we see here, some of it is bad photography, some of it is good photography, and some of it is great photography, but it is all worth a look. Shel's last upload is great photography. A fact borne out by the huge volume of commentary it has provoked.
Paul
On Oct 17, 2004, at 4:05 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote:


Shel Belinkoff wrote:

You know, I've been lambasted here many times for presenting
such photos, and have always wondered about how it is that so
many people here fall all over themselves when it comes to
complimenting sunsets and waterfalls and insects of pretty
colors and odd shaped macro images.

About a decade ago, I had the pleasure of looking after premises which acted
like a magnet to the homeless. Most of my colleagues dealt with them via the
Police, but after a short while I found there was a whole other side to
their dilemma. The really scary part is that the dividing line between
'normality' and the situation that many homeless folk find themselves in is
so thin, just a minor bit of bad luck, illness or a myriad of reasons can
transfer you to their side. I have the feeling that most of the problem is
that people recognise subconsciously how little in would take to join them
and that fear is manifested by disgust and disassociation.


Photographs bring these thoughts into your home, rather than leaving them on
the streets...


That's me through on this.

Malcolm







Reply via email to