Shel, The larger picture is more powerful than the original smaller version. It clearly makes a very strong impression. Congratulations on an excellent piece of communications. Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 07:51:44 -0700, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, took your advice and put up a much larger image ... might be a slow > download for someone with a slow connection, but there's not much I could > do about it ... so, here's large and small: > > http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh-lg.html > > http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/02-3shh.html > > Shel > > > > > > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I think in most cases the web image should be cropped the same as the > > print. The exception might be where there is interesting detail that > > gets lost in a small image. Perhaps the ideal solution in regard to > > your "Spare some sex" image would be a larger file. My web posts are > > generally 13 inches on the long side at 72dpi. That's still viewable > > without scrolling on all but the stingiest monitors. > >
