I'm quite satisfied with the Epson 3200. It does a great job on medium format and is adequate for most purposes with 35mm. I've even sold stock of 35mm pics that I scanned on the 3200, and I've made 12 x18 enlargements that look good. You can't tell much from web-based images, but here's a 6x7 scan: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2438913&size=lg
And two 35mm scans: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1644062&size=lg http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2556640&size=lg > I've been using a 3170 for prox 10 months. I assume > you're wondering about scanning 35mm. I'm not at all > excited about the results. I can get a better image by > visiting my corner mini lab keosk for a 1.4mb floppy. > > Jack > Med format is not too bad and allow 8x10's that are > moderately acceptible. > > --- Billy Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Steve Jolly wrote: > > > > > Anyone got one of these scanners to use with C41 > > negatives? I'm considering > > > upgrading to one from a Perfection 1660, and would > > be interested to see > > > opinions, sample scans, etc... > > > > And also does anyone know anything about the 4180, > > especially whether it's > > worth the extra cash for the higher res/new model? > > I'm upgrading from an > > old perfection 1260 without photo adapter so I know > > it's going to be > > better, just not how much. > > > > the owning of a superior scanner to mr jolly also > > drives me slightly :) > > > > billy > > > > -- > > "This is Dilirium. She is a gurl & she skip along > > saing hello clouds > > hello sky hello big green mouse-hed thing that > > etes people etc" > > Billy Abbott billy at cowfish > > dot org dot uk > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail >
