There was Pentax developed it. The called it the K-mount and licensed it to anyone who wanted to use it for $1.00. Not $1.00 per lens. Not $1.00 per year. Just $1.00 period. Most companies preferred to design their own mount so you were stuck with buying their cameras one you had a system. Such is the business mindset.

---



frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:12:11 -0400, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I believe they both used m42 mount lenses if that's what you mean.


Don't forget, m42 at one time was called "universal mount" - because it was.

Then when everyone went bayonet, they brought out their own unique
mounts.  Can't have folks swapping lenses now, can we?  Once you've
bought into a "system", there's no going back!

Wouldn't it have been nice if everyone would have got together to
decide on a universal bayonet mount?  Mind you, there'd be no
Cottyesque Frankencameras...  <vbg>

Seriously, it's more or less happened with rangefinders, M-mount being
the standard.  They could have done it with SLR's if they'd have had a
mind to do so.

cheers,
frank


-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html




Reply via email to