Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Anyone wish to share an opinion as to the digital >resolution difference between 100 ISO and 200 ISO?
The resolution is exactly the same (2008 x 3008) at any ISO setting. I suspect you mean noise level? >I keep hoping that a future "Daddy" D will have a min >range of 100. Do I care? I thought I would but have found that it doesn't make much difference to me most of the time. The noise level is more than low enough for me at ISO 200 that I don't need anything lower as far as image quality is concerned. I use ND filters when I need longer shutter speeds. I *would* like lower (and higher) ISO capability when I'm working with a fixed aperture/shutter-speed combination and fiddling with exposure by changing ISO. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
