Thanks, Mark. "Noise" grain would have an edge softening effect and I'm glad you feel it's insignificant. I have, possibly, an unhealthy addiction to high res images. I fret over critical focus, solid rest, fine grain film,(miss 25 ISO) the better optics, optimum focus..all those factors most of us consider when attempting to produce a 'sharp' image. I'll work on it and get help if needed.
Jack --- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Anyone wish to share an opinion as to the digital > >resolution difference between 100 ISO and 200 ISO? > > The resolution is exactly the same (2008 x 3008) at > any ISO setting. I > suspect you mean noise level? > > >I keep hoping that a future "Daddy" D will have a > min > >range of 100. Do I care? > > I thought I would but have found that it doesn't > make much difference to > me most of the time. The noise level is more than > low enough for me at > ISO 200 that I don't need anything lower as far as > image quality is > concerned. I use ND filters when I need longer > shutter speeds. I *would* > like lower (and higher) ISO capability when I'm > working with a fixed > aperture/shutter-speed combination and fiddling with > exposure by > changing ISO. > > -- > Mark Roberts > Photography and writing > www.robertstech.com > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
