A second approach would be to put the 500FTZ in Auto and wireless modes and dial compensation by setting larger apertures than the working one.
<UNQUOTE>
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that. Can you elaborate a bit
Tnx
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The MZ-S is the body that introudced the P-TTL.
You should dismiss 500FTZ too fast: if contrast control doesn't
satisfy you (the manual has a pretty good explanation of it) and the
subject is rather static, you can always set up manually the flashes
based on the working aperture, distance to subject and amount of
compensation for each flash. A second approach would be to put the
500FTZ in Auto and wireless modes and dial compensation by setting
larger apertures than the working one.
Servus, Alin
Patrick wrote: PG> Since the 360FGZ was originally designed for the MZ-S am I right in PG> assuming that the MZ-S has P-TTL mode ?
PG> I really hate flash work but i've got a small project that requires a PG> mult-flash setup and am working out how best to set-up.
