Thanks, Shell. It's not that I believe in numbers. It's just that I don't want to buy a lens just to resell and perhaps loose money in a month or so.
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 22. november 2004 22:27 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: Pentax-A 4/24-50mm vs. Pentax-F 4/24-50mm I'm ignorant, Jens. I don't even know what an MTF thing is or means. I just look at the results over a period of many photos and negatives. Get a feel for how the lens operates, its construction, etc. Truly a worthless approach for those who like and believe in numbers. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It seems they are both rated 2.5 (F) and 2.7 (A) at Photodo.com > Not very good. This is only a litle better than the Pentax SMC-FA > 28-80/3,5-4,7, which I have owned. It was certainly not outstanding, but > still quite usable. I don't know if MTF test can be trusted at all or even > taken seriously :-). > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 22. november 2004 20:04 > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: Re: Pentax-A 4/24-50mm vs. Pentax-F 4/24-50mm > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shel Belinkoff" > Subject: RE: Pentax-A 4/24-50mm vs. Pentax-F 4/24-50mm > > > > Hi Jens, > > > > it really stunk when the > > sun was anywhere near the front of the lens. > > Thats the smell of melting plastic. > > William Robb > >
