On 18 Dec 2004 at 23:03, Steve Jolly wrote: > Rob Studdert wrote: > >>http://www.elvum.net/gallery/paw/kw_gmac3 > > > > It's interesting, what was it's purpose, near macro experiment? film > > experiment? Record shot? Graphic interest? Your intentions are a little > > unclear so it's difficult to provide constructive comment. > > My intention was to take a nice photo of a tomato using a reversing > ring. :-) The film was just what happened to be in my camera at the > time, but don't let that stop you from saying that a different choice of > film (or equipment) could have improved the photo, if that's what you think. > > In general if I post a link to a photo for comment, I'm hoping that > people will tell me what they would have done differently to make it > better in their eyes. Assuming they can see any merit in it in the > first place... ;-)
No problems. I would have liked to see greater overall contrast and possibly more differentiation between the fruit and the vine, a nice green filter would have really made the tomato pop out (assuming that it was near ripe). Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
