On Thu, 10 May 2001, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:

>  
>       Basicly, as I see your situation, the main problem you seem to
>       have encountered (and learned from, too ;^) is that your meter
>       (as all meters) offers the exposure which will yield a "standard 
>       scene/18% grey" rendition. What you have is a predominately dark 
>       scene - so the meter suggests excess exposure to ensure the 18%
>       "average scene" rendition. 
> 
>       The comments on film repricocity are also relevant here for 
>       exposures longer than some particular time interval, depending
>       on the film. For longer exposures, it is usually better to extend
>       via larger aperture (up to that needed for required depth of 
>       field) rather than longer time, if you can.  
> 
>       Knowing this tendency of meters allows the photographer to
>       "compensate" by over-riding the meter in non-average conditions.
>       If the scene were excessively bright (as when a light sky is a
>       large portion of the frame), one would use this compensation in
>       the opposite direction - increasing the exposure to allow the
>       less bright portions of the scene to get enough exposure. If your
>       camera (I forget what you have) has an exposure compensation dial,

My camera is MZ-M and it has an exposure compenstion dial.
Earlier, when I was quite new to photography, I was unaware of special
trick (the one that you have suggested above) to do metering of
non-average situations. As a result, either my
main subject showed an underexposure or overexposure. Now, I am getting
some acceptable results but I am not much happy with it. I feel that the
use of neutral density graduated filter would have done better for
non-average situations.

 >      this makes it a simple matter to deal with these "non-average" 
>       situations. Plus to add & minus to reduce exposure. The camera
>       will then adjust one or the other exposure parameter.
> 
>       Bill
> 
>         ---------------------------------------------------------
>         Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
> 
>                                 http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
>                                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>         ---------------------------------------------------------

Thank you very much for your explaination and suggestion. 

With best regards,
Ayash Kanto.

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to