<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Yes, the January 2005 issue. I seem to remember there's a table in there >comparing caffeine content between different things. >Incidentally, it seems the photographs in that article were all shot on d-d-d- >digital. (Darkside, not Pentax. But nevertheless, it's only recently that NGM >has been running stories shot all digital.)
I don't mind wether the pictures are shot digitally or with film (do you?). I'm working as an editor for a newspaper and we almost only use digital pictures. I used to take pictures on film 'till two years ago. But today, i think, it doesn't make a difference any more for magazine or newspaper prints. Michael >Quoting Michael Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> It depends an what kind of green tea you are using. But a cup of Tea >> certainly has more caffeine (or teaine) tha a chocolate bar. >> There's a good "National Georgaphic" about Caffeine. I think it came out >> a few weeks ago. > > >Yes, the January 2005 issue. I seem to remember there's a table in there >comparing caffeine content between different things. >Incidentally, it seems the photographs in that article were all shot on d-d-d- >digital. (Darkside, not Pentax. But nevertheless, it's only recently that NGM >has been running stories shot all digital.) > > >Michael Heim was responding to this from Marnie aka Doe: > >> >Apropos of Nothing - I have never drunk coffee. I drink water pretty >> >exclusively. Although I am think of drinking green tea for its reported >> >diet effects >> >(helps one lose weight). Only I am not sure about the caffeine. I've never >> >> >liked caffeine. OTOH, most chocolate has caffeine. I wonder how much >> >green tea has >> >in comparison to most chocolate bars? >> > >> >I am not contributing to this discussion, at all, am I? :-) >> > >> >But maybe someone knows the answer to my question. > >
