On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:17:40 +0100, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome Scott. > Nice to have you with us. Don't forget to post some of your K1000 or MX > shots - even Mamiya ones :-) on a website somewhere. > I can recommend www.Flickr.com which is very easy to use - that's is if you > have access to a scanner. > Thanks for the recommendation. I actually have two domain names. The first, twosixteen.com, is primarily outdated photos of my daughter taken with the cheapest digicam known to man. The second is fivetoedsloth.us, which is currently a godaddy placeholder page. I will, hopefully soon, post some photos to one of these. (Now I just need to get around to scanning.)
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:36:42 +0100, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wouldn't be against trading my second 1.4 to an 1.7 so I'd have both... > > Open to any suggestion... This is something I may consider. I've never used the 1.7, so I'm anxious to try it out. I'll keep you posted, though. On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 06:27:04 -0500, Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say that Scott's already found a home here... > I can freeload with the best of them. <g> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 06:32:47 -0500, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to the PDML. And that's a good buy. Get ready to buy a lot > more. We specialize in enablement <vbg>. I've noticed! I think I'm in the right place. >The M series lenses are very compact and some are quite nice. But >generally speaking, both the later A series and the earlier SMC Pentax >lenses are optically superior. The M 50/1.7 is among the happy >exceptions. It's very good. I have no technical reason for this. I simply already have three M lenses (28/3.5, the oh-so-popular 50/2, and a 200/4) and figured that these would be a good foundation for the Icanspendmoremoneythanyouspendonscrapbooking lens collection. I do want to try a Takumar screw mount 1.4, so I guess I'll have to buy the adapter ring. Ooh! Or I could just get a Spotmatic. -- Scott Loveless Born free. Taxed to death.
