Ken Waller wrote:
Boris, you also might want to ask him if he's doing any "in camera" processing as far as saturation, sharpening etc.
Also are you trying to compare your digital images to similar film images? I prefer Velvia when I shoot film and consequently when processing digital images I try to give them a Velvia look (more saturated).
I was thinking along these lines as well Boris. If you and the other party were comparing 1st generation transparencies you might have a basis for drawing some kind of conclusion, and even then it would be difficult.
There's simply too many variables involved to conclude that what you like or don't like about a photograph is due to the lens used. Even subject matter. Take a picture of an ugly girl with a high quality lens and camera. Take a picture of a pretty girl using a Kodak 110 instamatic. Any guesses how many viewers would choose the pretty girl as being the better photo?
Tom C.
