I have some difficulty understanding this. Glass (even a Coke bottle bottom) has no ability to produce any discrete divisions in intensity, nor does it have the ability to compress the luminescence scale. Film does. Paper does. Digital sensors can. Sucky digital processing can. Glass doesn't. Now, one may have excess flair that can mask fine gradations at the dark end and give a muddy look...

A perfect reproduction imposes no transitions from light to darkness, any discernable transition would come from the nature of the subject and it's lighting alone.

If you see high contrast, but the transition from light to dark appears too narrow such that the fine smooth transition from light to dark is not discernable, I'd say look to something other than the lens.

Regards,
Bob...
------------------------------------------------
"A picture is worth a thousand  words,
but it uses up three thousand times the  memory."

From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Mike,

Ability to render very subtle changes of light and shade. This in turn
gives the image very 3D look. You almost feel like you're present on
site.

This is what I would call plasticity.

The lens that is not like this has very few distinguishable
transitions from light to darkness and back. So you get mighty
contrast image but it lacks detail, lacks fine representation, lack
this natural look.

Do I make sense?

Not sure what you mean by plasticity.



Reply via email to