Boris, I find the K24/2.8 OK, don't know about the M35/2.8. I'd trade the Takumar Bayonet 135/2.5 for the M135/3.5, a better lens. A still better 135 is the K135/2.5 (not the Takumar), but more expensive.
I don't care much for zooms, only the most expensive seem to give great results. The FA28-80 that came with my PZ-1 was so bad I almost threw the camera out. My suggestion is that you try some good prime lenses and check your technique. I have to concentrate to get the most out of my lenses. An 85mm or 100mm would probably be my purchase...maybe a 200mm too. Regards, Bob S. On 4/27/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > K 24/2.8 > M 35/2.8 > Takumar Bayonet 135/2.5 > Of course two zooms: 28-70/4 and 70-210/4-5.6 > > I am unsure about that Sigma 18/3.5 that I recently bought. > > The lenses I am sure are excellent are: > > FA 50/1.7 > M 50/1.4 > F 85/2.8 soft (truly unique) > Tamron 90/2.5 SP (thanks Joe Wilensky!) > > Boris
